Shapie, M. N. M (1,2) & Che Ramli, M.A. (1)
1. Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Rekreasi, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor.
2. Pertubuhan Seni Gayung Fatani Malaysia
ABSTRACT
Based on the data
from table 1.0, the data of the frequency and outcomes recorded is from Match 1
Pencak Silat Tanding Men Class E (Final) Vietnam vs Malaysia. In this match,
Malaysian fighter won the match. This is because of the accuracy of the fighter
successfully hitting the target on the opponent. Based on the table, Malaysian
fighter produced 50% of accurate attacking that hit the target. Whereas,
Vietnam fighter only produced 30% of accurately attack to the Malaysian
fighter. This is one of the reason Malaysian
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to describe the accuracy
among Indonesian Silat’s team during Sea Games 2015. A video recording from
www.youtube.com during the match was use for the analysis. The skills outcome
into three categories, which is hit target, hit elsewhere, and miss opponent. Independent
sample t-test used to analyse the data between winner and loser. Through this
studies, the result shows that the accuracy of Men’s class A accuracy is higher
than Men’s class D which higher percentage on hit elsewhere and miss opponent.
Keyword: kicking, martial arts, coaching, performance analysis
Introduction
Accuracy
or precision is the ability to accurately attack an opponent and precisely hit
the body to get point. In silat, accuracy is one of the most important aspects.
Accuracy is also what makes the difference between winning and losing in a
silat tanding match. Besides that, other silat component is the efficiency
entry system. It is one of the technique that able you to move fast and accurately
to approach the opponent. Furthermore, other silat component is the
accurateness of follow-up techniques. The system allows accurate punching and
kicking techniques. Accurate finishing techniques are more effective in
immobilizing the opponent.
The purpose of this research is to
determine the comparison of accuracy between winning and losing in silat 28th
2015 SEA GAMES in Singapore. In order to obtain valid data, it is needed to use
a high quality and empirically tested instrument. The purpose of this
instrument is to measure the attacking accuracy of the fighters. Based on the
video, the score is taken based on the accuracy of fighters that hit the
target. In conclusion, the accuracy of the fighter is what determines the
winner and loser of the match.
Materials
and method
Match
analysis
A video recording that is publicly available that shows two male silat match at the 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015 was used for analysis purposes. The first male match was a semi-final and final of men tanding class B of the 55kg weight category. The second male match was a semi-final and final of men tanding class E of the 70kg weight category. The system was used to identify 14 different types of event performed by the two male contestants as well as the start and end of action periods.
Video were played at a slower rate of 50% and shown in sequences that were repeated to allow an accurate measurement of each of the offensive and defensive movement category. The video were paused and played again to ease the analysis. The commencement and completion of each individual action period was recorded and the duration was calculated. The frequency, mean duration and percentage of total time were subsequently calculated
Motion categories
In silat, movement are categorize into 14 different silat exponent’s motion and are define a follow:
1) Punch
2) Kick
3) Block
4) Catch
5) Topple
6) Sweep
7) Evade/Dodge
8) Self-Release
9) Block and Punch
10) Block and Kick
11) Block and Sweep
12) Fake Punch
13) Fake Kick
14) Others
Statistical
analysis:
The
data that has been observed is frequenly counted, observational research uses a
method of recording which the recording records each occurrence clearly defined
behaviour within a certain time frame. All
the raw data generated by the recording are taken note and then transferred
into SPSS for more detailed analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using
Statistical Package for Social Scientists, version 14.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Results
Match 1 Pencak Silat Tanding Men Class E (Final) Vietnam vs
Malaysia
Vietnam (red)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
10
|
5
|
0
|
Kick
|
9
|
8
|
11
|
Topple
|
0
|
9
|
0
|
Sweep
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Evade
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
Self-Release
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
0
|
0
|
25
|
Fake Punch
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
30
|
24
|
44
|
Malaysia (Blue)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Kick
|
8
|
6
|
3
|
Topple
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
Sweep
|
0
|
9
|
1
|
Evade
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
Self-Release
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
Fake Punch
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
33
|
15
|
18
|
Table
1.0
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
23.3333
|
11.93035
|
6.88799
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
35.0000
|
10.14889
|
5.85947
|
Match 2 Pencak Silat Tanding Men Class E (Semi Final)
Singapore vs Malaysia
Singapore (Red)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
Kick
|
1
|
7
|
15
|
Topple
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
Sweep
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
Evade
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
Self-Release
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Other
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
Total
|
46
|
9
|
25
|
Malaysia (Blue)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
2
|
0
|
5
|
Kick
|
0
|
9
|
8
|
Topple
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
Sweep
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Evade
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
7
|
0
|
1
|
Self-Release
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
Other
|
6
|
1
|
0
|
Total
|
50
|
12
|
14
|
Table 2.0
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
25.3333
|
21.38535
|
12.34684
|
Singapore
|
3
|
26.6667
|
18.55622
|
10.71344
|
Match 3 Pencak Silat Tanding Men Class B (Semi Final)
Malaysia vs Vietnam
Malaysia (Red)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
7
|
0
|
2
|
Kick
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
Topple
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Sweep
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
Evade
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
7
|
0
|
1
|
Self-Release
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Other
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
30
|
4
|
4
|
Vietnam (Blue)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
9
|
6
|
3
|
Kick
|
2
|
6
|
2
|
Topple
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Sweep
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Evade
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Self-Release
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Other
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
27
|
14
|
5
|
Table 3.0
Group Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
12.6667
|
15.01111
|
8.66667
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
15.3333
|
11.06044
|
6.38575
|
Match 4 Pencak Silat Tanding Men Class B (Final) Malaysia vs
Thailand
Malaysia (Blue)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
6
|
3
|
4
|
Kick
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Topple
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Sweep
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Evade
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Block
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
Catch
|
6
|
1
|
0
|
Self-Release
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
Other
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
41
|
9
|
10
|
Thailand (Red)
Notation
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Punch
|
13
|
1
|
1
|
Kick
|
3
|
6
|
7
|
Topple
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Sweep
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Evade
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
Block
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Catch
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Self-Release
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Kick
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
Fake Punch
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
Other
|
16
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
59
|
8
|
9
|
Table 4.0
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
20.0000
|
18.19341
|
10.50397
|
Thailand
|
3
|
25.3333
|
29.16048
|
16.83581
|
Discussion
fighter
won.
Based on the data from table 2.0, the
data of the frequency and outcomes recorded is from Match 2 Pencak Silat
Tanding Men Class E (Semi Final) Singapore vs Malaysia. In this match,
Malaysian fighter produced 65% meanwhile the Singaporean fighter only produced
57% accuracy. In this match 2, the Malaysian fighter won.
Based on table 3.0
shows the frequency of action and outcomes recorded during the Pencak Silat
Tanding Men Class B (Semi Final) Malaysia vs Vietnam. In this game, Malaysian
fighter produced 78% higher percentage of accuracy in the match that allow him
to win. However, Vietnam fighter only 58% accuracy that made him lose the
match.
For the Match 4 Pencak Silat
Tanding Men Class B (Final) Malaysia vs Thailand, this match was won by the
Malaysian fighter. Looking at the accuracy of the Thailand fighter, which he
produced 76% meanwhile the Malaysian fighter only produced 68% accuracy.
Looking at the percentage of the Thailand fighter produced, he should have won.
But from the other side, he made too much unforced error which cost him the
match. The unforced error he made, made him lose points and lose the match to
the Malaysian fighters.
In conclusion, from all the data
collected above, we can make a conclusion that accuracy is an important aspect
in this Silat Tanding match. The more accurate the attacks, the more point the
fighter win. The higher the accuracy, the higher percentage the fighter to win
the match.
Conclusions
The
purpose of this research is to determine the comparison of accuracy between
winning and losing in silat 28th 2015 SEA GAMES in Singapore. In
silat, accuracy is one of the most important aspects. Accuracy is also what
makes the difference between winning and losing in a silat tanding match.
Accurate finishing techniques are more effective in immobilizing the opponent.
In the first match, Malaysian fighter produced 50% of accurate attacking that
hit the target. Whereas, Vietnam fighter only produced 30% of accurately attack
to the Malaysian fighter. In the second match, Malaysian fighter produced 65%
meanwhile the Singaporean fighter only produced 57% accuracy. In the third
match, Malaysian fighter produced 78% higher percentage of accuracy in the
match that allow him to win. However, Vietnam fighter only 58% accuracy that
made him lose the match. In the last match, the accuracy of the Thailand
fighter, which he produced 76% meanwhile the Malaysian fighter only produced
68% accuracy.
In conclusion,
based on the data and report given above, we can conclude that accuracy is
important to win the match. But as we can see, we can’t only focus on one
aspect. We need to see other aspect such as speed and reaction time.
.
References
Angleman,
A. J., Shinzato, Y., Van Hasselt, V. B., & Russo, S. A. (2009). Traditional martial arts versus modern
self-defense training for women: Some
comments. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(2), 89-93. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.12.001
del Estal,
A., Brito, C. J., Galindo, V. E., Lopez Diaz de Durana, A., Franchini, E., & Sillero-Quintana, M.
(2017). Thermal asymmetries in striking combat sports
athletes measured by infrared thermography. Science & Sports, 32(2), e61-e67. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2016.09.005
Falco, C.,
Alvarez, O., Castillo, I., Estevan, I., Martos, J., Mugarra, F., et al. (2009). Influence of the distance
in a roundhouse kick's execution time and impact
force in taekwondo. Journal of Biomechanics, 42(3), 242-248. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.041
James, L.
P., Robertson, S., Haff, G. G., Beckman, E. M., & Kelly, V. G. (2017). Identifying the performance
characteristics of a winning outcome in elite mixed
martial arts competition. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(3), 296-301. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.001
Jemili, H.,
Mejri, M. A., Sioud, R., Bouhlel, E., & Amri, M. (2017). Changes in muscle activity during karate
guiaku-zuki-punch and kiza-mawashi-guiri-kick
after specific training in elite athletes. Science & Sports, 32(2), 73-81. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2016.11.002
Lakes, K.
D., Bryars, T., Sirisinahal, S., Salim, N., Arastoo, S., Emmerson, N., et al. (2013). The healthy for life
taekwondo pilot study: A preliminary evaluation
of effects on executive function and bmi, feasibility, and acceptability. Mental Health and Physical
Activity, 6(3), 181-188. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.07.002
Negahban,
H., Aryan, N., Mazaheri, M., Norasteh, A. A., & Sanjari, M. A. (2013). Effect of expertise in shooting and
taekwondo on bipedal and unipedal
postural control isolated or concurrent with a reaction-time task. Gait & Posture, 38(2), 226-230.
doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.016
Nguyen,
D.-M., Laffont, I., & Dupeyron, A. (2016). Martials arts use in physical and rehabilitation medicine: Literature
review and perspectives. Annals of Physical
and Rehabilitation Medicine, 59, Supplement, e55-e56. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.07.128
Nien, Y.
H., Chang, J. S., & Tang, W. T. (2006). The comparison of kinematics characteristics between single and
successive kicking techniques for the taekwondo
player with an olympic medal: A case study. Journal of Biomechanics, 39, Supplement 1, S563. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(06)85323-6
Reifel
Saltzberg, J., Hondzinski, J. M., & Flanders, M. (2001). Humans adapt the initial posture in learning a
whole-body kicking movement. Neuroscience
Letters, 306(1–2), 73-76. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01875-4
Reishehrei,
A. P., Reishehrei, A. p., & Soleimani, E. (2014). A comparison study of self concept and self efficacy in
martial arts and non martial arts athletics
in iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5025-5029. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1067
Thibordee,
S., & Prasartwuth, O. (2014). Effectiveness of roundhouse kick in elite taekwondo athletes. Journal of
Electromyography and Kinesiology, 24(3),
353-358. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.02.002
VencesBrito,
A. M., Rodrigues Ferreira, M. A., Cortes, N., Fernandes, O., & Pezarat-Correia, P. (2011).
Kinematic and electromyographic analyses of a
karate punch. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 21(6), 1023-1029. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.09.007
Zago, M.,
Mapelli, A., Shirai, Y. F., Ciprandi, D., Lovecchio, N., Galvani, C., et al. (2015). Dynamic balance in elite
karateka. Journal of Electromyography and
Kinesiology, 25(6), 894-900. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.10.002
Zhang, W., Liu, Z., Zhou, L., Leung, H., & Chan, A. B. (2017).
Martial arts, dancing and sports
dataset: A challenging stereo and multi-view dataset for 3d human pose estimation. Image and Vision Computing,
61, 22-39. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2017.02.002
Recommendation
In my
recommendation, training reorganizing should not only focus on one aspect. This
is because the factors influencing the athlete condition
are internal factor
and external factor. In other words, the influential thing
to attain achievement is not only the physical condition but also other
significant elements. Training should also focus on upper and lower body
training such as punching and kicking technique. When the basic techniques are
improved, other elements such as accuracy and speed can be improved. The faster
and the more accurate the fighter can produce, the higher the percentage the
fighter will have. This will allow him to be a complete fighter.
No comments:
Post a Comment